Details
Note: This formula is inspired by the fragrance stated here, using GCMS analysis data and our nose,is not an exact copy. The original formulations belong to the respective brands. We are not affiliated with any fragrance brand mentioned here. The presented images are merely illustrative. Our formulas are composed for educational purposes, inspired by the most popular perfumes on the market. It may be the basis for your personal experiments, studies or researche.
BJ (verified owner) –
This is a fragrance that I have owned for a long time and it was interesting to see the formula. It’s surprising that 3 cheap and common materials make up 2/3 of the formula considering how much it retails for! Testing immediately after blending it smells very close to the original and I’m sure it will be even better after a few days of maceration. I diluted it to 20% and the only criticism I have is that it doesn’t have much tenacity, becoming a very quiet skin scent after not much more than an hour. It is slightly lacking the sweet honey note found in the original and I am going to experiment with adding some Firmenich Honey Sig to the formula. Overall an excellent formula. It would be good to see some more Amouage formulas on here.
John Applebloom –
Oud and I do not agree easily. There aren’t too many oud-based perfumes out there that appeal to me but I am always trying to learn and appreciate it. Jubilation is to me an example of the ones that I do not necessarily understand. It does remind me of Duro a bit but this is much less in-your-nose-dry. Duro sucks up the water from the air, Jubilation leaves some of that green sappiness fresh. Unfortunately, it leaves me uninterested but it might be your think if you like dry woods.